Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:05

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Young & Restless Preview: Cane’s Agenda Revealed — ‘No More Secrets and No More Games’ - Soaps.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Carbon capture method mines cement ingredients from the air - Tech Xplore
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
James Cook faces the heat from Bills beat reporters - Buffalo Rumblings
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Has any man licked his wife's vagina while another man had sex with her?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Analysts revamp forecast for Nvidia-backed AI stock - TheStreet
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
How are you spending your best time?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.